Posted: March 13th, 2023
The primary difference between these two entities lies in their purpose and power. The Estates-General was formed out of necessity by Philip IV in response to his financial woes caused by his extravagant spending habits (Coombs et al., 2017). This assembly consisted of representatives from all three social classes – clergy, nobility, and commoners – who voted on matters of taxation for Philip’s projects such as military defense or public works. While this group had some authority over taxes levied upon its members, it did not have any real legislative power due to its lack of representation from all regions within France (Norton & Johnson 2020).
In contrast to this limited role that the Estates-General played in French politics during its early years, the Paris Parliament has acted as a much more powerful government institution since its formation during Louis XIV’s reign (Gillispie et al., 2019). This new entity held far greater authority than its predecessor; it retained considerable influence even after Louis XVI summoned the States General into being again many years later. Instead of voting solely on taxation or royal decrees as before, this parliament had full control over creating laws pertaining to civil matters such as commerce regulation which could be enforced across France without further approval from royalty (Ozouf et al., 2015).
To summarize then: while both parliamentary systems have distinct histories that can be traced back hundreds of years ago; there remain several key distinctions between them today including their respective roles within governmental affairs along with how they were initially founded . This helps explain why one continues serve predominantly advisory status delivering verdicts only after careful deliberation among various estates while other stands above all others making final decisions quickly and efficiently whenever necessary .
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.