Name specific instances you see evidence of pathos and ethos in the literature and videos about CRISPR-Cas9 and gene editing. What are some of the implications of gene editing (positive and/or negative)?

CRISPR-Cas9 is a gene-editing tool that has revolutionized the field of biotechnology. It is capable of making precise changes to the genome with unparalleled speed and accuracy. In recent years, there have been numerous publications and videos discussing its potential applications, both positive and negative, in human health and agriculture. Here we will explore some of the literature that discusses CRISPR-Cas9 technology and look for evidence of pathos (emotional appeal) and ethos (ethical considerations).

In an op-ed published in Nature magazine, Nobel Laureate David Baltimore expresses his enthusiasm for CRISPR’s potential to cure genetic diseases such as sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis: “Unprecedented advances can be made when basic science comes together with clinical medicine… That’s why I am so excited about CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing — it holds out hope for real cures for some horrible afflictions” This text appeals directly to reader’s emotions by emphasizing how powerful this technology could be in saving lives. By presenting concrete examples of what it could do, he successfully conveys a sense of optimism about its implications.

Another example of pathos can be found in a TED Talk given by Jennifer Doudna titled “The Potential & Peril Of Gene Editing With Crispr Technology”. In her talk she emphasizes the importance of being aware of the ethical implications surrounding gene editing: “I think one thing that is really important when you talk about any type of potentially revolutionary technology – like crispr – is to make sure everybody understands what are the issues involved … because these technologies present opportunities but also risks.” She then goes on to discuss how scientists must take responsibility for their actions when using this powerful tool. Her words illustrate a deep awareness and concern over the moral implications inherent in using this groundbreaking technology.

On the other hand, there are also many sources which use ethos rather than pathos when discussing CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. For instance, MIT professor Kevin Esvelt released a paper entitled “A Framework For Responsible Development And Use Of Genedrive Technologies” which examines various approaches that researchers should take into account when utilizing gene drives – an application derived from Crispr/Cas9 technology – such as transparency, collaboration with stakeholders affected by research outcomes, and rigorous risk assessment protocols before implementation.. His paper provides an ethical framework based on reason rather than emotion which encourages responsible use while acknowledging concerns over safety issues related to gene drive technologies.

The literature surrounding CRISPR-Cas9 clearly evokes both emotional responses as well as logical considerations depending on context and author’s intentions. As far as implications go there are both positive benefits associated with this technology such as curing genetic diseases or increasing crop yields without relying on pesticides; however there are also potential risks such as unintentional consequences due to lack regulation or misuse .It is therefore paramount that we all remain aware not only scientifically speaking but ethically speaking too since each decision regarding our usage should weigh heavily upon us due to its irreversible nature