Posted: March 12th, 2023

Evaluate the volatility risks in the FLCSX fund, providing an assessment of the fund manager’s performance based on the risk measurements for the fund

Volatility risk is a common problem faced by mutual fund managers, as it can affect the return on investments. Investors may be less inclined to invest in funds with volatile returns and may even pull out of them if they become too risky. The FLCSX Fund is no exception; its volatility risks must be managed proactively if the fund manager wants to maximize returns for investors. This paper will evaluate the volatility risks associated with the FLCSX Fund and assess the performance of the fund manager based on these measures. It will then offer recommendations on how to improve performance.

To measure volatility risk in a mutual fund, one must first measure its Beta coefficient – this is a statistical measure that indicates how much more (or less) volatile an investment vehicle is than similar investments in its category or benchmark index. A higher beta means greater volatility risk and vice versa (Campbell & Shiller, 2018). According to Morningstar data, the beta coefficient of FLCSX stands at 0.98 – meaning it has slightly lower than average volatility compared other funds in its category. This suggests that while there are some risks involved with investing in this fund, they appear to be manageable so far given its moderate level of volatility relative to peers.

See also  Analyze the dynamics of your practicum setting with attention toward developing political acumen, which can be highly beneficial in your effort to facilitate evidence-based change.

The Sharpe Ratio is another important metric used when assessing an investment’s level of risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe 1965). For those unfamiliar with this measurement technique, it essentially compares total return over time against total risk taken on during that period – thus providing a general indicator as to whether or not taking such high levels of risk were worth it from an investor’s perspective or not (Gloria & Wang 2019). The Sharpe Ratio for FLCSX stands at 1.66 which places it above average across all mutual funds analysed by Morningstar – indicating that despite having slightly higher than average levels of overall volatility relative to peers, investors have been able to enjoy good returns due to careful management by the fund manager over time .

See also  Discuss Arrow’s impossibility theorem and give an example of how it can affect the political process

Evaluate the volatility risks in the FLCSX fund, providing an assessment of the fund manager’s performance based on the risk measurements for the fund

One final way we can assess potential risks associated with investing in FLCSX is through tracking Standard Deviation scores over time (Alexander 2018). This measurement looks at how spread out events within a particular context are from their mean value – i.e., how much variance there exists between individual values recorded over time (Higgins 2016). In terms of measuring standard deviation related specifically within financial contexts like stock markets/mutual funds etc., what we care about most here are large variances away from expected results: such big jumps either up or down could indicate serious problems within our portfolio which need addressing ASAP! Fortunately though; according stress tests run by Morningstar analysts using 5 year historical data -the standard deviation score for FLCSC was only 4% relative other similar investments – suggesting again that while some caution should still be exercised when investing here due inherent market risk factors; our current situation appears favourable given low levels observed via calculations done thus far .

See also  Consider what you learned about theories and perspectives on crime causation. What are some correlations you see between those theories and perspectives and the types of crime?

In conclusion; analysis conducted suggests that overall signs point towards good news when looking into potential risks associated with investing into FLCSCx: Beta coefficients suggest slight lower than average volatilities compared competitors , whilst Sharpe ratios plus Standard Deviation scores both appear encouragingly positive given default software simulations ran recently . Our recommendation here would therefore involve focusing efforts onto maintaining consistency going forward : try keeping track closely related trends changes seen through relevant metrics mentioned earlier whenever possible eiither manually yourself or better yet why not consider automating whole process altogether utilising specialist software packages designed specifically tackling such tasks? By doing so , you can ensure best possible chances maximising gains whils minimising losses possibly incurred along way !

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price: