Posted: February 16th, 2023

Comment  on the accused pedophile called “Alex” in the article. If you agree  with David Eagleman, how does it support your view. If you disagree with  Eagleman, how do explain this case?

The article discusses the case of “Alex,” a man accused of pedophilia. The details of Alex’s situation are not discussed in depth; however, it is stated that he was convicted and punished for his crime. David Eagleman argues that Alex should not be labeled as a pedophile but instead be given an opportunity to develop better decision-making skills before being given another chance in society.

I agree with David Eagleman’s perspective on this issue for several reasons. To start, labeling someone as a pedophile carries serious social stigma which can limit their opportunities and hinder their ability to rebuild their lives after incarceration. By labeling someone in this way we are also perpetuating the notion that individuals cannot change, which may create an unhealthy atmosphere where those who have made mistakes feel they will never be able to redeem themselves or learn from their experiences. Additionally, by failing to give individuals such as Alex the opportunity to become productive members of society upon release we are only increasing the risk that they will reoffend – thus creating more victims and further damaging society as a whole.

See also  Describe the historical issues and context that lead to the creation of the social problem and policy development.

Furthermore, I believe rehabilitation should always be considered when dealing with criminal cases such as these rather than simply punishment alone – especially if actions taken have been shown to reduce recidivism rates. Research has consistently demonstrated that programs designed to help inmates address underlying issues or provide targeted educational or employment assistance can significantly decrease recidivism rates among both child molesters and other types of offenders (e.g., drug users).

Comment  on the accused pedophile called “Alex” in the article. If you agree  with David Eagleman, how does it support your view. If you disagree with  Eagleman, how do explain this case?

This suggests there is potential for improvement with some interventions; therefore, it would seem logical for society to attempt methods aimed at rehabilitation over pure punitive measures such as labeling criminals like Alex with negative labels without any consideration towards trying to help them reform prior to release from incarceration..

See also  What is the difference between machine-executable and macro viruses?

In conclusion, I think it is important for us all too consider cases like Alex’s carefully – recognizing both the harm done by those who commit crimes against minors but also understanding how our response affects future outcomes for victims and perpetrators alike. We must focus on finding solutions which allow us both punish wrongdoers appropriately while also giving people second chances when appropriate so long as public safety remains paramount priority throughout every stage of the process

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price: