Argument either for or against the existence of God.

On the opposite side of this debate are those who consider themselves atheists; individuals who deny the possibility of a god existing at all. Atheists typically reject any evidence provided by believers which supports a divine power because they see them as unreliable sources due to their inherently subjective nature compared with scientific proof which can be tested and verified using empirical methods. In addition, they also point out logical inconsistencies within various religious texts which could suggest that if there were an omnipotent deity responsible for creating everything then surely He would not allow suffering and injustice on such a scale seen throughout human history? This type of thinking shows how difficult it is to provide definitive answers to questions surrounding God’s existence without resorting to speculation or reliance on faith based claims; something which is antithetical for most atheists who prefer only accepting facts which can be scientifically proven rather than accepting beliefs based purely on faith alone.

Ultimately, both sides have valid points regarding this age-old debate over whether or not God exists. Believers point out that there is plenty of circumstantial evidence from religious scriptures that suggest some sort of higher power may be behind creation itself while skeptics offer legitimate criticisms towards these beliefs which question why an all-powerful Creator would allow so much pain and suffering within our world if He did indeed exist? It is impossible say definitively one way or another whether or not an almighty being could ever exist such matters remain open ended questions without true answer yet accessible through human reason alone regardless how convincing either argument may seem both those advocating against its presence those hoping find tangible proof its existence will likely continue struggle reach common ground anytime soon!